Re: Re: [Cclan-commits] CVS: asdf asdf.lisp,1.89,1.90

Edi Weitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cclan.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 09:06:33 +0000, Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh no!
>
> I honestly don't think that this is a good idea.  (I should have
> replied about this earlier, and for that lapse I apologise.)

Yeah.  Alan asked me privately to commit this and I thought it was OK
because nobody had replied negatively.  Feel free to revert this
change.

> I claim that the use of *features* for functionality testing is
> almost always wrong, in that it does not have a fine enough
> granularity; it's usually better to test for the functionality you
> actually need.

I agree in theory.  In practise I think it's nice to have this as a
convenience feature.  One could also argue that those who agree with
your POV don't have to use these features - they don't really hurt.
With Alan's patch one has the choice to use them or not.  Without
Alan's patch one is (well, in a way) forced to see things your way.  I
vote for more choice... :)

Cheers,
Edi.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.