Re: [Sbcl-devel] Re: Order of *CENTRAL-REGISTRY* traversal

On 7. Dez 2005, at 14:22, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:

> End result: current overriding behaviour for user-space components,  
> but overriding a contrib takes extra work: you need to add new  
> functions to *m-p-f* and *s-d-s-f* to do that, instead of just  
> pushing on *central-registry*.
>
> How does that sound?

Sounds good to me - IIUC, this passes the asdf-install test (can the  
user inadvertently break asdf-install on sbcl?) while still making it  
easy for developers to override stuff they're working on.

Rudi