Re: asdf version proposal
Sean Ross <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: >>>>>> "SR" == Sean Ross <[email protected]> writes: > > SR> Hi all, I've been working on more comprehensive version > SR> support in asdf and i think it's finally ready for public > SR> consumption. > > [...snip...] > > > SR> This patch does not address the concept of compatible versions > SR> but I feel that that can be added at a later date. > > You lost me here. Can you expand on "compatible versions" (as opposed > to, presumably, "versions satisfying version number predicate")? aargh, poor choice of words. I'm thinking of a situation where you have version 1.3.1 of system X loaded and you want to load version 1.3.5 If these two version of system X are "compatible" then it should be fine to load 1.3.5 instead of signalling a continuable error. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV