>>>>> "CR" == Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> writes:
CR> [email protected] writes:
>> What I fear is that someone will sit down and bash out an a2sdf
>> that will fragment the healthy consensus, without being a good
>> enough improvement over the current asdf.
CR> I think I probably should have mentioned: for me, the first
CR> test that any a2sdf candidate must pass is for asdf
CR> compatibility, so that current users have a smooth upgrade
CR> path. (That is emphatically not the same as modifying asdf's
CR> internals incompatibly, which to me seems definitely worse
CR> than a fork with a different name; please, please, if you
CR> change interfaces, don't reuse the name!)
OK, then I think we're in agreement!
I do think it would be worthwhile to collect some design suggestions
and feature requests prior to commencing any such effort, though. I
am very impressed with ASDF generally, but I'd like to see the next
version come out of a process that would ensure improvement, rather
than just difference.
Best,
R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.