Re: ASDF-Install patch to allow installation of unsigned packages
Gary King <[email protected]> Thu, 24 May 2007 13:40:23 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Todd and Andreas, I see your point regarding requiring a license file but I'm not sure that I agree because ASDF-Install already has several "loopholes": * you can set *verify-gpg-signatures* to nil or to a list of trusted locations * you can choose a restart around an invalid or untrusted signature In this case, I know and trust Kevin Rosenberg and was willing to take the risk and get the software even though it wasn't signed. I didn't like ASDF-Install thinking it knew better than me. Without the patch, I'm forced to download the software, unpack it, move it to the right place, setup symbolic links, etc. To my mind, a consistent ASDF-Install is one that allows people to skip all of these checks (with verification). It makes no sense to allow software to be installed with an invalid signature but prevent it from being installed with a missing one. Are you arguing that all of these restarts be expunged from ASDF-Install? -- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 885 9127 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/