Re: ASDF-Install patch to allow installation of unsigned packages

> It seems to me that these are choices made by the person installing  
> a package, whereas making a package without a signature is a choice  
> made by the person providing the package.

Tim, this is a reasonable distinction.

> I'm okay with opting out of the signature verification on my end if  
> it's expedient, but I'm not really down with a potential  
> proliferation of unsigned packages.  In my world, an unsigned  
> package should not be called ASDF-INSTALLable.

Could it be ASDF-Installable but just not be called that (kidding!).
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 885 9127
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/