Re: ASDF depends-on / do-first
Andreas Fuchs <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:22:29 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cclan.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kilian Sprotte wrote: > Hi Richard, > > thanks for your mail! But sorry, may I still ask again, > what is the difference between :in-order-to and :do-first > then? Or what is so special about :do-first? I think it's just the order in which they are processed in TRAVERSE. in-order-to forms seem to be done before do-first is, but do-first needs to happen before the actual operation (iiuc). > I think this comment here is irritating me: > > ;;; XXX crap name > (do-first :initform nil :initarg :do-first) Well, it /is/ a crap name (-: Hope this helps a bit, -- Andreas Fuchs, (http://|im:asf@|mailto:asf@)boinkor.net, antifuchs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/