Re: XCVB, a replacement for ASDF

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Robert P. Goldman <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1.  There is no way to wrap some actions around all of the operations
> performed on a module; I believe that this is because we consider the
> perform on a parent component to be done after the performs on all of
> its sub-components

It follows from the plan-then-execute, using
deal-with-dependencies-on-the-run should take care of this.

> 4.  It would be nice if there were some clear relationship between
> packages and asdf systems.  This relates to:

> 5.  The system definition should support documentation operations.

Hear hear!

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/