Re: asdf restart named in the keyword package

Christophe Rhodes <csr21 <at> cantab.net> writes:

> 
> Gary King <gwking <at> metabang.com> writes:
> 
> > I'm happy to apply this patch unless the internet says "no".
> 
> Here's one reason why not, though you'll have to use your judgment or
> get further discussion.
> 
...

> If try-recompiling is ASDF:TRY-RECOMPILING, that would have to be
> written
>   (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c) (invoke-restart (find-symbol
"TRY-RECOMPILING" "ASDF") c))))
>     (require :foo))
> if the user is not certain that asdf is already loaded.
> 


Well, the use cases I am thinking about are at the repl where it's easy enough
to ensure asdf is loaded.  I usually use asdf:oos anyway as I switch lisps a
lot.  However, if one is doing something fancier I don't think it's much of a
hardship to have the more verbose form.  I wouldn't use handler-bind in the repl
directly anyway: it's too verbose.

I had the following, very specific macro in mind when I started down this path:

(defmacro punt (system)
  `(handler-bind ((sb-fasl::invalid-fasl-version
                     (lambda (e) 
                       (let ((restart (find-restart :try-recompiling)))
                         (if restart (invoke-restart restart) (signal e))))))
      (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op ,system)))




Matt


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php