Re: asdf restart named in the keyword package

Matthew Swank <akopa.gmane.poster <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> Gary King <gwking <at> metabang.com> writes:
> 
> > 
> > I have no strong feeling about this one way or the other. I don't mind  
> > some keyword pollution but also enjoy the conceptual purity of the  
> > restart being in the ASDF package.
> > 
> > Is there any stylistic or historical preference for one route over the  
> > other?
> 
> Restarts specified by ansi are named in the common-lisp package.  

It looks like swank restarts not named by in common-lisp are named in the swank
package as well.

Matt




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php