Re: in-order-to and/or do-first

Gary King writes:
> Can anyone recall why we have both in-order-to and do-first? Doesn't  
> in-order-to subsume do-first?

This came up a little more than a year ago:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cclan.general/674

--
Richard

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/