Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net

GP lisper <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cclan.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
   From: Gary King <[email protected]>
   Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:39:55 -0500

   > Actually, I'm rather tired of the current "but it's better" nonsense
   > on version control systems.  I've heard a dozen names now, and most of
   > that crap is hard to maintain and disappears quick to the next-new-kid
   > on the block.  ...
   > Some new tool that will be dead
   > next week makes sure that software dies.


   I agree with your conclusions but not your premises <smile>. Many of  

Boy am I surprised ;-)

   the dvcs tools have been around for a long time (in software years),  
   are used by zillions of people and work much better than CVS for lots  
   and lots of use cases. OTOH, I no longer see the point of Subversion  
   since it, at least, is not better enough than CVS.

   If you do decide to move and do decide to use a DVCS, then I'd vote  

ah, I thought YOU were asking, I'm just a run-over bystander

   that we use git (I'm personally a big darcs fan but bit has much  
   greater momentum, is "more" cross-platform and is building a bigger  
   echo-system, ummm, ecosystem.) Other thoughts?

Just one

Please leave a method for those folkes interested in a silly idea,
they just want to utilize the software, not master a rcvs system to
get it.  It used to be that a hyperlink to a tar file download was
pretty common, but recently those have disappeared.
Just include one.

r

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword