Re: terminating clisp: clisp.exe vs lisp.exe
"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | InformatiMago. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sam Steingold <[email protected]> writes: >> * Pascal J. Bourguignon <[email protected]> [2012-06-08 12:58:38 +0200]: >> >> Perhaps it would be a good idea to remove the call to fork() from the >> clisp driver? > > there is no fork() there. > unix uses execv(), windows uses CreateProcess(). Indeed. The OP report is bogus. Anton Vodonosov <[email protected]> writes: > Hello. > > My program starts clisp as a child process to do some work. > Sometimes this work may hang. > > In this case I would like to kill the child lisp process. > > clisp.exe starts another process, lisp.exe which, as I understand, > preforms all the job. > > It's not trivial to even get process id of lisp.exe. It is trivial to get the process id of a child process. You just get it as result of fork(2) (or CreateProcess()). In bash(2), this child process PID is returned by the special variable $!: clisp -norc -q -ansi \ -x '(format t "~%clisp pid=~A~2%" (process-id))' & \ echo "bash pid=$!" > What are my options to reliable kill started CLISP? Memorize the child PID, and use it to send a signal. > Is it possible to start CLISP in a way that it consists only of one process? It consists only of one process. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel