Re: /bin/pwd
Daniel Jour <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACZHyTP2Nc5Jkx0vdB6PPTWf8SwsVdvvK=4OZw4jDKNQ9DvPGg@mail.gmail.com> |
I'd like to come back to this (keeping changes only locally works, but until now I've found no better solution than to have a patch, apply it and always revert before making modifications, which is not nice.): Jan Stary wrote: > You are suggesting to discard the standard, portable way of doing things > in order to accommodate one Frankenstein system. > Not that I have any say in this, but no way. What's more portable: /bin/pwd (which does not work on my "Frankenstein system") or pwd (which works on my system, too)? Or put differently: Is there any system that we know of where my change actually breaks something? As a side note: > How about you locally make a /bin/pwd symlink > and leave things like they should be? This might work on my laptop, where I'm root and so on. But I might also want to push the build (nix allows for that in a very convenient way) to one random (low load) computer in my universities computer pool. > Hm, yet another Frankenstein. If you have a cp(1) that cannot cp > or a mv(1) that cannot mv, fix _that_ before writing any scripts. Yes, I fix it by providing my own ... in ~/bin. One is not always root. Another note: /bin/pwd will (does) break on a system with GNU Guix, too. Guix is the (only?) package manager under the GNU umbrella. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel