Re: Comment on proprietary advertising (Re: clisp max heap size on 64 bit machines)
Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7813832.jYOTpYt6qQ@omega> |
Hi Sam, There are more alternatives to sourceforge: not only savannah.gnu.org but also gitlab.com or common-lisp.net. I haven't evaluated the merits of each, though. > Moreover, my experience is that FSF services are unreliable. This was the case around 2009 or so, but since 2011 or so I have rarely had issues with the GNU infrastructure. On rare occasions, the mailing lists delayed mails by 1 day. That's the only problem I can remember. Yes, planet.gnu.org is often inaccessible, but AFAIH it's being run by a volunteer, not by the GNU sysadmins. > Moreover, while mailing list archives may be good, the bug tracker > sucks. I find the mailing list archives OK. Their main plus is that they provide permanent URLs that still work 10 years later. What I miss most is a view of threads that cross the month limit, like gmane used to have. The bug tracker is good for me. Once you've learned how to customize it, it helps you to focus on certain kinds of bugs, depending on your current priorities. > Bruno, is the gnulib mailing list hosted by FSF? > Are you happy with them? Yes and yes. But as Daniel said: in the current phase of good work on the code, any change in the infrastructure (code repo, mailing list, bug tracker) would be annoying. Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel