Re: gcc warnings
Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1852617.ZPTG2gx2L0@omega> |
Hi Sam,
> The same story with ignoring GCC warnings today - I don't understand the
> subject and I am leaving it to you
I will deal with these GCC warnings. But to keep the story short:
1) It is better to start with all warnings and disable the warnings
on case-by-case basis, than to start with no warnings and enable them
selectively. Reason: GCC keeps adding new, useful warnings for a number
of years already. [1]
2) clang has become a compiler to care about as well, and clang has also
a number of useful (and a small number of not useful) warnings.
Bruno
[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/manywarnings.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned
dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an
account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and
projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition.
http://sdm.link/oxford
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel