Re: TEST_NT hack and OpenBSD
Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <10370431.9ljmxcBZFZ@omega> |
Hi Sam, > You added a dozen files and hundreds of lines of code You should view the change in 'hgview' (*). I added one file (newer.c) and removed one file (test.m4); the rest are imports from gnulib - maintained at gnulib. > The platforms which do not have bash or korn shell are not used for > active CLISP development and **RE**compiling modules is NOT a big deal > for them, so `rm -rf module-dir` is fine. You are not distinguishing the intended effect of the TEST_NT code and the actual effect. The intended effect was, as you say, just a convenience for clisp developers working on modules. The actual effect was a build failure on OpenBSD (with the default 'make' and default shell of OpenBSD). Bruno (*) hgview needs a couple of customizations in order to be useful: $ tail -n 4 .hg/hgrc [hgview] maxfilesize = 5000000 diffbgcolor = white difffgcolor = black ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel