HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Daniel Jour <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACZHyTMYGRvg8+hPf8H8+8CZJcp+-kOTsMz=2QAB+RWqr98GxQ@mail.gmail.com> |
We have a lot of code that is only included if HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT is defined. Now, C99 requires that type (long long int as well as unsigned long long int, both with 64 bits - excluding padding bits of course). Thus I think we should get rid of those conditionals depending on HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT. Because that affects a lot of code, the best approach is probably to only gradually remove occurrences of such conditionals (as opposed to a massive change). Ideas / Thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel