Re: HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1865121.evudiCVNYC@omega> |
Hi Daniel, > We have a lot of code that is only included if HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT is > defined. Now, C99 requires that type (long long int as well as > unsigned long long int, both with 64 bits - excluding padding bits of > course). > > Thus I think we should get rid of those conditionals depending on > HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT. I disagree. This would break the ability to compile with MSVC. Last time I checked (Visual Studio 2015), it did not have 'long long', only __int64. Has this changed in Visual Studio 2017? Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel