Re: [PATCH 2/2] silence comment5 warnings

Hi Bruno,

> * Bruno Haible <[email protected]> [2017-03-21 00:27:16 +0100]:
>
> Sam wrote:
>> I would rather eliminate comment5 altogether, rather than mutilate the
>> code to pacify it.
>
> Eliminating comment5 would not help here, since the warning comes from
> 'varbrace', and comment5's processing does not modify the lines that
> trigger the warning.

varbrace is not needed either. C99, IIRC, supports arbitrary placement
of declarations.

We need to drop comment5 and varbrace and rename all *.d files to *.c.
Then gctrigger should convert them to *.m.c and cc should compile *.m.c
to *.o.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net https://ffii.org
http://mideasttruth.com https://jihadwatch.org http://www.dhimmitude.org
main(a){printf(a,34,a="main(a){printf(a,34,a=%c%s%c,34);}",34);}

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel