Re: Dead code found, some questions and suggestions
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <095d748b315f4f4dac23435f4dde4aec@HE104834.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> |
Hi, Compro Prasad wrote: >4) I was considering to provide each symbol with a mutex so that they could be > locked when any function tries to change the value of the symbol. So you consider introducing a software write barrier. Please explain to me why you think that only symbols should be protected this way, not arbitrary slots? Why do you want to protect (setf (symbol-value x) #) but not (setf (car x) #) ? Could you please elaborate on your rationale? What is the added value or use-case? Regards, Jörg Höhle ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel