Re: GSoC 2017 eval

Sam Steingold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clisp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> * Compro Prasad <[email protected]> [2017-07-01 11:55:03 +0500]:
>
> I am sorry that I failed your requirements.

You failed GSoC requirements, not "ours": most of the work should be
done __BEFORE__ the midterm eval; the mentors should be reasonable
confident that the student will succeed.  We have seen no code.

> At least you should have given me a chance to see the results.

What results?

> You have demotivated me more than I thought of.

I am sorry to hear that.

> I was a bit inactive because of two reasons: improper internet
> connection, first time communicating through email.

Incidentally, please _always_ use the "Subject:" line appropriately.

> I had planned to have a good second month as I was returning to my
> college on 7th July or so which has continuous internet connectivity.

Google set the GSoC schedule.
The schedule requirement are not up to us.

You are still welcome to contribute to GNU CLISP.
You can also apply to GSoC 2018.

Thank you.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://honestreporting.com
http://camera.org http://islamexposedonline.com http://jij.org
The best herbal therapy is growing herbs on enemies' graves.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.