Re: How to handle these warnings?
Daniel Jour <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACZHyTOQ844isO293RhEGvAR4A9bg0ob1BTNdjLL_vhm4WeT-g@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Sam,
Sam wrote:
> Not necessarily.
> When _redefining_ GF we can look
> at the old definition and carry the
> slot over to the new one, unless
> we also see
>
> (declare ((not dynamically-modifiable)))
>
> in the new definition.
Note that this may lead to situations where loading the exact same code
will lead to different results, depending on previous definitions: a GF
without any declare expression would be dynamically modifiable depending on
whether there was a previous definition. As such the specification whether
a GF is dynamically modifiable wouldn't be declarative ("declare" ??).
Best, Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel