Re: CLISP CLOS style warnings

Aren't you working on the first release in many years? That might be a good
time to define some feature.

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017, 11:08 Sam Steingold <sds-mXXj517/[email protected]> wrote:

> > * Faré <[email protected]> [2017-08-01 10:07:33 -0400]:
> >
> >> To mark a generic function as user-extendable, one can now use a
> >> declaration:
> >>
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >> (defgeneric perform (...)
> >>   (declare #+clisp (dynamically-modifiable))
> >>   ...)
> >> (defgeneric operation-done-p (...)
> >>   (declare #+clisp (dynamically-modifiable))
> >>   ...)
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >>
> >> The declaration is now in `hg tip` (but has not been released yet).
> >>
> > Will that declaration cause a warning or error on older versions of
> > clisp? If yes, what read-time conditional more precise than #+clisp
> > can I use to only enable on recent enough versions of clisp?
>
> My first reaction was
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (declaim (declaration dynamically-modifiable))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> but for some reason it does not work with defgeneric.
> Sorry.
>
> --
> Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
> http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net
> http://www.memritv.org
> https://jihadwatch.org http://camera.org http://jij.org
> Only a fool has no doubts.
>