Re: Use (f)puts instead of (f)printf when possible.

Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clisp.devel
Message-ID <2101639.yV567bqaAa@omega>
Hi Sam,

> > #define fprint(fp,string) fputs(string,fp)
> > #define print(string) fputs(string,stdout)
> 
> I don't like this for 2 reasons:
> 
> 1. I am opposed to gratuitous deviations from the standard coding
> practices because they raise the barrier to entry for new people.

I understand the "barrier to entry for new people" argument. But in this
case I found it worth it.

> 2. I prefer names that are not substrings of other names for the sake of
> grepping convenience. E.g., I would use `cprint` instead of `fprint' and
> `cputs` instead of `print` ("c" stands for CLISP &c)

You can use the grep option '-w' to search for 'print' only:
  $ grep -w print *.d
  $ grep -w 'print *(' *.d

Bruno


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.