Re: support for pre-C99 compilers
Sam Steingold <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> * Bruno Haible <[email protected]> [2017-10-19 22:08:58 +0200]: > > Sam wrote: >> > Anyway, this pre-C99 support is not a lot of trouble. >> >> This prevents us from dumping varbrace, so it's kinda big deal. > > No. Until we can also remove 'gctrigger', How can that ever happen?! > removing 'varbrace' does not have a significant benefit. The huge benefit is that C files will look like normal C. Removing varbrace and comment5 (what does "5" stand for, btw?) is just as important for CLISP as making cua-mode the default for Emacs. ;-) > (We had this discussion already.) yes, and I disagree with you. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504 http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://jij.org http://www.memritv.org http://americancensorship.org http://think-israel.org Never argue with an idiot: he has more experience with idiotic arguments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel