Re: Pari module build failure

Sam Steingold <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:34:10 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clisp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> * Sam Steingold <[email protected]> [2018-01-22 11:16:57 -0500]:
>
>> debug_gcsafety builds work:
>>
>>   linux-x86_64       (*)
>
> nope: boot builds, base fails:
>
> /home/sds/src/clisp/current/modules/regexp/regexi.c: In function 'Values C_subr_regexp_regexp_exec()':
> /home/sds/src/clisp/current/modules/regexp/regexi.c:120: error: invalid conversion from 'char*' to 'const uintB*'
> /home/sds/src/clisp/current/modules/regexp/regexi.c:120: error: invalid conversion from 'char*' to 'const uintB*'
> /home/sds/src/clisp/current/modules/regexp/regexi.c:120: error: invalid conversion from 'char*' to 'const uintB*'
> /home/sds/src/clisp/current/modules/regexp/regexi.c:120: error: invalid conversion from 'char*' to 'const uintB*'
> make[1]: *** [regexi.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sds/src/clisp/current/build-porting64-gcc-debug_gcsafety/regexp'
> make: *** [regexp] Error 2

IOW, patch e28a1c6d0963 did not fix the problem.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1561
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://no2bds.org
http://camera.org http://honestreporting.com http://mideasttruth.com
Why do we want intelligent terminals when there are so many stupid users?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel