Re: bug reporting
Bruno Haible <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:54:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3028182.t7ZDnM4OsI@omega> |
Hi Sam,
> the current list is:
> https://clisp.sourceforge.io/beta/impnotes/clisp.html#bugs
>
> is this all we need?
Probably it could be streamlined by distinguishing build failures from
other bugs. For the other bugs, "clisp --version" will give us the
version, compiler flags, versions of dependencies already, so no need to
ask for it explicitly.
How about this?
"When submitting a bug report, please specify the following information:
1. What is your platform (uname -a on a UNIX system)?
2. Please supply the full output (copy and paste) of all the error messages
3. Please provide step-by-step instructions on how to reproduce the problem.
4. If you are reporting a build failure:
- Compiler version? GNU libc version (on GNU/Linux)?
- What is the version of each of the DEPENDENCIES?
- Where did you get the CLISP sources? When? (Absolute dates, e.g., “2006-01-17”,
are preferred over the relative ones, e.g., “2 days ago”. If you are using
Mercurial, please supply the output of hg id).
- Which configure command were you using, and what are the values of the
environment variables CC, CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS, LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
- Please attach all build logs.
5. If you are reporting any other bug:
- What is the output of clisp --version?
- Where did you get the CLISP sources or binaries? When? (Absolute dates,
e.g., “2006-01-17”, are preferred over the relative ones, e.g., “2 days ago”.
If you are using Mercurial, please supply the output of hg id).
"
Bruno
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel