Re: max string size
[email protected] (Don Cohen) Wed, 4 Dec 2024 15:42:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This seems (so far) to have worked: ./configure CC='gcc -DTYPECODES' build-dir then after make I get [1]> (software-type) "gcc -DTYPECODES -g -O2 -no-integrated-cpp -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-declarations -Wimplicit -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-format-nonliteral -Wno-shift-negative-value -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -DNO_ASM -DENABLE_UNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES libgnu.a -lreadline -lncurses /usr/local/lib/libffcall.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/libsigsegv.a SAFETY=0 TYPECODES WIDE_HARD SPVW_BLOCKS SPVW_MIXED TRIVIALMAP_MEMORY libsigsegv 2.14 libreadline 8.1 libffcall 2.4" [2]> (length (make-array (* 1024 1024 5) :element-type 'character)) 5242880 [3]> (length (make-array (* 1024 1024 9) :element-type 'character)) 9437184 [4]> (length (make-array (* 1024 1024 17) :element-type 'character)) 17825792 [5]> (length (make-array (* 1024 1024 33) :element-type 'character)) 34603008 Make check reports only the usual one permission denied from streams.erg re: SAFETY=0 TYPECODES WIDE_HARD SPVW_BLOCKS SPVW_MIXED TRIVIALMAP_MEMORY I'm a bit surprised by SAFETY=0 -- should I be worried? The TYPECODES WIDE_HARD SPVW_BLOCKS agree with what I saw in 2.49+ (2010) but the SPVW_MIXED TRIVIALMAP_MEMORY differs from that and is what I see in 2.49.93+ (2018), as opposed to SPVW_PURE SINGLEMAP_MEMORY in 2.49+ I have no idea whether those choices are good, bad or indifferent. Any advice? _______________________________________________ clisp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-devel