Re: question about type specifiers
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4779FE7B0FF61A4998104E492AD7D6BC0111E08E6037@HE110882.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> |
Don Cohen wrote: >(INTEGER #.MOST-NEGATIVE-FIXNUM (0)) >(INTEGER #.MOST-NEGATIVE-FIXNUM -1) You could use that one, yes. >(INTEGER #.(+ MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM 1)) 1+, 1-, how ugly. A real mathematician would likely prefer a notation Involving exclusive upper and lower bounds, and this is exactly what the extra parentheses introducing singleton lists mean. See Section 12.1.6. Interval Designators http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/12_af.htm about Compound Type Specifier Names in 4.2.3 http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/04_bc.htm MOD in CLHS still has the CLtL2 example you mention http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/t_mod.htm Regards, Jörg Höhle ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ clisp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list