Re: No update in over six years...

> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:25:28AM -0700, Caitlin wrote:
>> I can only surmise that clisp is a defunct project given the fact that the
>> current version is still 2.49 after more than six years. Perhaps the web
>> site should be taken down? At this point, are there not better options that
>> are actually maintained?

You already tried to declare CLISP dead 4 years ago.
I am glad you are still interested.

No, CLISP is still alive, we even had a student in GSoC this summer.
We do want to make a release, but, alas, we need skilled labor for that.
Would you like to volunteer?

> * Jean Louis <[email protected]> [2016-12-16 13:15:02 +0300]:
>
> Yes? There is also mercurial version, if you need it as development.
>
> I am using it on my side, and preparing good business with it. It is
> running in background right now, preparing the satellite imagery of
> mining lands for our clients.
>
> There is mailing list, and you people are helping in development.
>
> Just like any other free software project, it may have some bugs, so
> what? Is that a new thing in free software world?
>
> If you wish to be more specific, you should say specific problem you
> have, otherwise, the documentation is pretty specific and it is
> finally Common Lisp by standard, and if something is missing, you may
> file a report or request.

Thanks Jean!

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://iris.org.il
https://ffii.org http://memri.org https://jihadwatch.org
Don't ascribe to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list