Re: Reading pipe from *standard-input*?
Jean Louis <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Mar 2017 22:31:01 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I get it. I was thinking it is other serious identation. Hooh. Relief. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > > * Jean Louis <[email protected]> [2017-03-23 21:57:12 +0300]: > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:30:45PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > >> When you code for yourself, you can use whatever coding style you like. > >> When you ask _US_ to read your code, I think it is only natural that you > >> follow the accepted coding style. > > > > Yes, it is too general, I don't know what you refer to. > > Please write > > (defun foo () ...) > > instead of > > (defun foo nil ...) > > for function that accept no arguments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list