Re: Reading pipe from *standard-input*?

Jean Louis <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Mar 2017 22:31:01 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clisp.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I get it. I was thinking it is other serious identation. Hooh. Relief.

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > * Jean Louis <[email protected]> [2017-03-23 21:57:12 +0300]:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:30:45PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> >> When you code for yourself, you can use whatever coding style you like.
> >> When you ask _US_ to read your code, I think it is only natural that you
> >> follow the accepted coding style.
> >
> > Yes, it is too general, I don't know what you refer to.
> 
> Please write
> 
> (defun foo () ...)
> 
> instead of
> 
> (defun foo nil ...)
> 
> for function that accept no arguments.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list