Re: Recovering the once true meaning of type NIL in LOOP

> *  <[email protected]> [2017-12-05 14:53:32 +0000]:
>
> So here's a patch for clisp to do the same (even though clisp mostly
> ignores types).  With it, clisp and MIT LOOP destructuring look
> strikingly similar.

Could you please also add a test case?

Thanks.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://www.dhimmitude.org
http://islamexposedonline.com https://jihadwatch.org http://memri.org
If I had known that it was harmless, I would have killed it myself.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list