Re: thread priority ?

Sam Steingold <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:38:31 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clisp.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

> *  <[email protected]> [2017-12-19 12:32:51 +0000]:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>It seems to me that a low priority process being able to lock out a
>> high priority process
>>is a sign of poor application design
> It's not poor design, it's the essence, the true nature of locks.

I was thinking about threads doing something very different from each other.
You are talking about a more "symmetric" situation.
Thanks for your explanations.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://memri.org
http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.memritv.org http://iris.org.il
An elephant is a mouse with an operating system.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
clisp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list