Re: thread priority ?
Sam Steingold <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:38:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clisp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, > * <[email protected]> [2017-12-19 12:32:51 +0000]: > > Sam wrote: >>It seems to me that a low priority process being able to lock out a >> high priority process >>is a sign of poor application design > It's not poor design, it's the essence, the true nature of locks. I was thinking about threads doing something very different from each other. You are talking about a more "symmetric" situation. Thanks for your explanations. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504 http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://memri.org http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.memritv.org http://iris.org.il An elephant is a mouse with an operating system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ clisp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list