Re: defsystem & eval
Sam Steingold <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:33:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clocc.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | disorganization |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> * Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> [2005-08-18 17:21:08 -0400]: > > On Aug 18, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: > >>> * Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> [2005-08-18 15:45:00 -0400]: >>> >>> I see not other way but to revert to the previous version. >> >> you can replace (eval foo) with >> (typecase foo >> (function (funcall foo)) >> (otherwise (eval foo))) >> this will work for the top-level cases. > > Ok. But what do you gain with this? You can write > > :finally-do #'foo > > instead of > > :finally-do (foo) > > ? I am not sure I understand you. > Is that all? look at cllib.system: (let (x) (defsystem ... :initally-do (setq x 1) :finally-do (print x)) ) replacing (setq x 1) with (lambda()(setq x 1)) will not eliminate compilation warnings. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k <http://www.honestreporting.com> <http://www.memri.org/> <http://www.dhimmi.com/> <http://www.savegushkatif.org> My other CAR is a CDR. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf