Re: defsystem vs asdf
Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:34:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clocc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 16, 2005, at 3:30 PM, Paolo Amoroso wrote: > Sam Steingold <[email protected]> writes: > >> is it true that "defsystem is dead and everyone should switch to >> asdf"? > > I don't know whether DEFSYSTEM is dead. But I would use CLOCC > subsystems much more if there was support for ASDF. > But MK:DEFSYSTEM supports subsystems in a nicer way than ASDF. So, the question is why don't you give it a spin. Cheers Marco -- Marco Antoniotti http://bioinformatics.nyu.edu NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488 715 Broadway 10th FL fax. +1 - 212 - 998 3484 New York, NY, 10003, U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf