Re: patch: workaround for ooracle segfaults in unicode sbcl

James Bielman wrote:
> I thought about this some more this afternoon, and I think I finally
> understand what's going on.  The OCI functions are assuming the extent
> of the C strings lasts beyond the extent of the Lisp string on a Unicode
> SBCL, because it must make a temporary copy to convert a string to a
> SIMPLE-BASE-STRING.

Nice work. Good talking to you on IRC. I'll commit your
patches. Thanks once again.

Kevin