Re: Need for testing [was Re: one more time.lisp patch]

Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, Alex. This is about the 4th or or 5th fix to the
> microsecond patch I accepted last year. While improvements to CLSQL
> are welcome, it is suboptimal to incorporate patches that have so many
> bugs.

To be clear, I've committed your patch. I was speculating about the
best way to handle future patches that did not just correct bugs, but
extended the behavior of CLSQL.

Kevin