Re: [Patch] Update view-database only if the transaction succeeded

Saurabh Nanda wrote:
> No. I thought of that. *transaction-insert-list* is bound only when
> you're using the with-transaction macro. However, someone may use
> start-transaction/commit/rollback separately which is going to break
> everything. If and only if the dynamic context for
> *transaction-insert-list* is set, should we push objects into it.

I see. So, only by using with-transaction (and not with
start-transaction/rollback) will one have support for rolling-back the
database slots of the objects. If using with-transaction buys the user
better rollback support than available by using the individual
transaction functions, that should go in the documentation as well.

-- 
Kevin Rosenberg
[email protected]