Re: Rollback, or fix for 5.0.4?

On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> I suppose that this is cold comfort to the OP, but I'd argue this
> suggests that we should revise the CLSQL asdf definitions to use the
> :version dependency to record which versions of CLSQL are compatible
> with which versions of UFFI and CFFI-UFFI-COMPAT.

That's an good idea. I'll take a look at using ASDF version dependency.
(I wasn't aware that ASDF had that functionality).

In general, when a new CLSQL requires a newer version of UFFI, I put
that dependency in the ChangeLog.

For JCM, what is broken with using the latest version of CLSQL and
UFFI? It has been working for me.

Kevin