Re: CLSQL version 5.1.0 released

Kevin, I am using sbcl 1.0.37.  I tried simply loading clsql-odbc, 
rather than trying to compile everything, and it worked with 5.1.0.  My 
confusion comes from trying to use asdf-install to install clsql; 
asdf-install wants to compile everything, and for some reason, in that 
context, cffi trumps uffi for precedence.

Thanks for the pointer!

-Kevin


On 04/21/2010 10:12 AM, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Kevin Raison wrote:
>> So UFFI has this function with the proper keyword?  If so, how do I get clsql to use UFFI's function and not CFFI's?  It seems that having both packages as dependencies can cause some strange behavior;  does anyone know a good way to avoid this kind of clash?  I tried removing CFFI entirely from my asdf:*central-registry*, but clsql fails to compile without it.
>
> Yes, UFFI has the proper keywords. I started UFFI back in 2001 to be CLSQL's helper library.
> The latest UFFI should always work with the latest CLSQL.
>
> To use UFFI, it should be as simple as loading something like clsql-mysql ASDF module which will
> automatically load UFFI (amongst other ASDF modules like clsql and clsql-uffi ASDF). The only
> case where what isn't true is on CLISP since UFFI doesn't support CLISP.
>
> What Lisp implementation are you using?
>
> Kevin