Re: CLSQL indirect table bug
"Philipp Marek" <philipp-8mGJuhTcji29ZAADn/[email protected]> Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:50:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clsql.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Russ, > This is definitely something I have seen happen, but have not till now > taken the time to track down. ... > The patch is available at: > https://github.com/UnwashedMeme/clsql/ Thank you very much, applied locally, will test. > The patch ID: > b475f491ffc24cacd2d7250e356a3d3a15532e94 Yes, thanks, just immediately after the two other fixes for my reports ;) > Thanks for the bug reports, please keep them coming. NOOOOOooooooooo..... I'd much prefer to have it "just work"!!!! ;) Oh, BTW, another questions ... If I've got joined tables, and both use a sequence for the primary key, what are the necessary steps to get two new (linked) objects into the DB? Is (update-records-from-instance) with both objects enough, or do I need to make sure that the order of the objects match the constraints? Regards, Phil