Re: CLSQL indirect table bug

"Philipp Marek" <philipp-8mGJuhTcji29ZAADn/[email protected]> Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:50:37 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.clsql.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Russ,

> This is definitely something I have seen happen, but have not till now
> taken the time to track down.
...
> The patch is available at:
> https://github.com/UnwashedMeme/clsql/
Thank you very much, applied locally, will test.


> The patch ID:
> b475f491ffc24cacd2d7250e356a3d3a15532e94
Yes, thanks, just immediately after the two other fixes for my reports ;)


> Thanks for the bug reports, please keep them coming.
NOOOOOooooooooo.....
I'd much prefer to have it "just work"!!!! ;)


Oh, BTW, another questions ... If I've got joined tables, and both use a sequence for
the primary key, what are the necessary steps to get two new (linked) objects into the
DB?
Is (update-records-from-instance) with both objects enough, or do I need to make sure
that the order of the objects match the constraints?



Regards,

Phil