Re: unsigned 64 bit integers patch
Russ Tyndall <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:17:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clsql.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Please review the changes in this branch:https://github.com/UnwashedMeme/clsql/tree/sqlite3-ai-and-fix-atol64and check that they work for you. No more tests are failing than previously so I think this is probably good to be merged into master and pushed upstream. Cheers, Russ Tyndall Acceleration.net On 1/7/2014 1:53 PM, Russ Tyndall wrote: > On 1/6/2014 11:49 PM, Aaron Burrow wrote: >> Why do you not use parse-integer(...) ? > After some quick tests, using the C functions allows us not to bring the > C-string into lisp and thus uses about 50% of the memory of a > parse-integer approach. I tested using sqlite3, querying a table of > 1.8M 64bit ints. The C approach also uses a little less processing power. > > Cheers, > Russ Tyndall > Acceleration.net > _______________________________________________ > CLSQL mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.b9.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clsql _______________________________________________ CLSQL mailing list [email protected] http://lists.b9.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clsql