Re: with-slots usage question

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:00:25PM +0100, Tim Moore wrote:

> >regular function by that name?  The reason I've been prepending the
> >base-class name to my accessor functions is that I've been worried
> >about defining functions like name, size, length, etc.

> That's what packages are for :)

Well, yes, Except that almost every package uses the COMMON-LISP
package, so you still lose if you'd like accessors called LENGTH,
STRING, etc.

I ended up with GET-STRING, but I'm wondering if there's a better
convention out there...

Anyone?

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus

_______________________________________________
Clump mailing list
[email protected]
http://manly.caddr.com/mailman/listinfo/clump

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/r+VNbSpkIAKPfsURAjGUAJwPL/sSTgysZrb5aDtqjnBqIo0CTwCfa+cN
HAyXAwT8Pp5nSw4HjZzBQkY=
=OTMp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----