Re: A Day At The Beach
Miles Egan <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:36:43 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.clump |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1069090603.1180.39.camel@car> |
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 12:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > I just can't stop writing articles - and this one is about Smalltalk no > less... > > We recently discovered Seaside, which is a Web Application Framework > for Squeak Smalltalk, and it simply blew us away. That's why I wrote a > short article about it: > > 'A Day At The Beach' describes our first exploration of the Seaside Web > Application Framework for Squeak Smalltalk that offers a dramatic > improvement in abstraction and productivity. > > http://homepage.mac.com/svc/ADayAtTheBeach/index.html Interesting. I like the idea of continuation based frameworks and inversion of control and I've even played around with Seaside a bit myself. It's very impressive for small demos but I wonder how well this approach scales to higher loads and more complicated apps. For instance, it's not obvious to me how you'd do complex form validation in a framework like this. How do you handle a big form with lots of fields and different validation schemes? What kind of overhead do these continuation based frameworks incur? Can they really be made to scale? Are there security implications of exposing such a fundamental and powerful language construct in a web environment? You also lose the possibility of bookmarkable urls, but I think I can live with that for the kind of applications I'd want to develop in a framework like this. -- Miles Egan <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Clump mailing list [email protected] http://manly.caddr.com/mailman/listinfo/clump
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/uQcrU4Jq/wH1PVERAmLbAJsEvFj2SXH6uUKUkgeLtjXmAL0RVgCfVwqf g073X7kwoOgUo+Xk3JIKUOc= =oK7J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----