Re: LispWork patches

Friedrich Dominicus <[email protected]> writes:

> I'm wondering if you could intergrate them or if they were wrong.

I had a look at them this evening, but I'm puzzled.  A lot of the
patches seem to be about CMUCL or SBCL, or otherwise nothing to do
with LispWorks.  They also are apparently diffed against some other
version of CLX than the telent.net tree.  Not having Lispworks easily
available to test against, this makes it very difficult to tell what's
going on. 

If you can produce a clean patch against telent CVS head (or any
recent tarball from telent clx, but the CVS would be preferable) I'll
certainly merge it (that goes for anyone else who feels up to it, too.
The patches were posted to this list and should be in the archives),
but in the meantime I'm uncomfortable with disentangling these
changes.  Sorry about that, but I hope you can see where I'm coming
from.


-dan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBlph3HDK5ZnWQiRMRAs+bAKCOSZff4fbd2smmxhSMe5HkxOUiTQCfVD5m
u5TWhvq7cjRsN5qEvyWLN0o=
=DCOt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----