Development direction

Hello, 

Christophe Rhodes writes:
 > 
 > Does anyone else have any ideas for further development?  I have
 > several things that I think would be of benefit either to vendors or
 > to users, including:
 > 
 > * some kind of coming to terms with Unicode support.  I'm slightly
 >   inclined to generalize the documented default TRANSLATE function
 >   simply to call CHAR-CODE, which I think will do the right thing for
 >   iso10646-1 fonts;

I support this proposal.  Though, CLX allows vectors of integers as
well, and we probably should not break that.

-- 
Robert Strandh

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming: any sufficiently complicated C
or Fortran program contains an ad hoc informally-specified bug-ridden
slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Portable-clx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.metacircles.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/portable-clx
cvs -d :ext:cvs.telent.net:/usr/local/src/cvs co clx  # over ssh
cvs -d :pserver:[email protected]:/cvs co clx  # anonymous