Re: [Portable-clx] bit-bash-copy gone
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:27:25 +0300 (EEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel,gmane.lisp.clx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Christophe Rhodes wrote: > Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> writes: > >> - (sb-kernel:bit-bash-copy sdata src-idx ddata dest-idx width))))) >> + (sb-kernel:ub8-bash-copy sdata src-idx ddata dest-idx width))))) > > Are you sure that ub8-bash-copy is the right one? Without having "Not at all." I thought I said something to that effect bu on rereading my email I realized I was more just blithering about REPLACE... Though on second thought, _if_ the old bit-bash-copy was built on memcpy, then presumably it dealt with octets? (Forwarded to sbcl-devel so that nfroyd can comment on this, maybe.) /me whishes for world peace and regression tests Cheers, -- Nikodemus Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious." Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs." ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click