Re: SBCL 0.9.2.x

Friedrich Dominicus <[email protected]> writes:

> ; caught STYLE-WARNING:
> ;   redefining DECLARE-BUFMAC in DEFUN
>
> ; compiling (DEFUN DECLARE-BUFFUN ...)
> ; 
> ; caught STYLE-WARNING:
> ;   redefining DECLARE-BUFFUN in DEFUN

> erred while invoking #<COMPILE-OP NIL {1001C1B7E1}> on
> #<CLX-SOURCE-FILE "dependent" {10020BF121}>
>    [Condition of type ASDF:COMPILE-WARNED]

> Ups. Probably an asdf problem. So let's retry, 
> maybe the dreaded asdf:*compile-file-warnings-behaviour*
> but well that seems to be ok:
> asdf:*compile-file-warnings-behaviour*
> :WARN

The clx.asd adjusts this dynamically, to prevent style-warnings from
creeping back in.  This does mean that, as you've discovered, it is
not necessarily possible to compile files twice without asdf
complaining; however, if you had continued by accepting the results of
the compilation, it would have gone to completion.

> However with a restart I finally managed to get it compiled so in fact
> I was wrong but the other fact is that the patch is not yet applied
> and that it fails in between. 

Restarting the image completely would work too, yes.

Cheers,

Christophe

_______________________________________________
Portable-clx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.metacircles.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/portable-clx
cvs -d :ext:cvs.telent.net:/usr/local/src/cvs co clx  # over ssh
cvs -d :pserver:[email protected]:/cvs co clx  # anonymous