Re: (eq x nil)
Raymond Toy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cmucl.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/8/11 3:12 AM, Helmut Eller wrote: > The compiler transforms (null x) and (not x) to (if x t nil). > We could to the same for (eq x nil). That would make a small difference > in code like: Good idea. I'll look into it. Without looking, it seems like a relatively simple thing to do. Ray _______________________________________________ cmucl-imp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-imp